IRC channel logs
2025-04-10.log
back to list of logs
<ZhaoM>If I understand correctly, if we want to try rumpdisk, we need to let qemu attach a sata disk <ZhaoM>damo22: ah cool, so '-device ahci' is not neccessary <ZhaoM>and the issue I mentioned about the printing of `wd0d: device timeout reading fsbn` after poweroff does not exist anymore when I use -M q35 rather than '-device ahci' <damo22>i think changing the machine type to q35 makes a lot of changes to the machine layout <damo22>eg what peripherals are connected <ZhaoM>damo22: thanks, I will submit the patch to add the trying rumpdisk qemu script to the webpage <ZhaoM>hi some license questions. I'm writing an article introducing Guix childhurd service. Can I use GFDL1.3+ to publish it? If yes, there's only a single markdown file, how to do it? <youpi>using 1.3+ should be fine yes <youpi>you can just send the .md file <ZhaoM>I mean all the work is done on a single markdown file <ZhaoM>should I just add the license script in the comment <ZhaoM>or put the whole notice in the markdown comment and add a line like "this article is published under GFDL1.3+" at the end of the article <youpi>this is a trivial wiki page example <yelninei>hi youpi, janneke told me to ask you here. I have been trying to investigate failing guix hurd packages with glibc 2.41. I found that glibc commit 8ef17919509e909746b0ad6465e9c6c952a3fe34 is breaking the gnulib test-symlink/symlinkat test in many core packages because it now returns ENOTDIR instead of EINVAL <youpi>please investigate which exact case should be doing what <youpi>(gnulib being pedantic on errnos does not really help :) ) <youpi>somebody asks me to fix something one way <youpi>then somebody asks me to fix the same thing another way <youpi>i.e. the question needs to be considered globally <youpi>i.e. check both the test you see in your case, and the test that triggered the fix, detailed in the bugzilla <youpi>to come up with a desired behavior that meets both expectations <yelninei>in the symlink test gnulib accepts EEXIST or EINVAL (or ENOENT). From the bugzilla it looks like EEXIST would work for both? <sneek>yelninei, you have 1 message! <sneek>yelninei, janneke says: seen the remark above about asking youpi about the glibc commit that breaks the symlink test? possibly mailing bug-hurd is even better <youpi>yelninei: possibly, tested patch welcome ;) <Pellescours>what is the Linux behavior on this case? Does it return EEXIST ?