IRC channel logs
2024-06-07.log
back to list of logs
<concussious>hi, what kind of tooling are y'all using for manual pages? <concussious>i sent a mail to debian-hurd, but then I noticed the irc channel <concussious>i want to upstream my mdoc(7) manual for xf86-input-keyboard, but I want to make sure that is going to be fine for you guys <concussious>motivation: increasing apropos specificty across freebsd stack <damo22>concussious: probably best to email bug-hurd at gnu.org <damo22>concussious: yes we definitely have man pages <damo22>concussious: our maintainer replied to your email anyway <concussious>am I understanding? "man xf86-input-keyboard" does nothing on hurd? <youpi>and it does bring the kbd driver manpage <youpi>from the xf86-input-keyboard package <concussious>oops, duh, sorry. are you guys using groff for that? <youpi>we're just using man from debian <youpi>which apparently depends on groff <concussious>perfect, thats exactly what i wanted to know, thank you! <damo22>concussious: thank you for fixing it <solid_black>I don't think we have man pages, because, uhh, GNU policies, we have info pages instead <solid_black>the original Mach had man pages for its APIs, though <solid_black>though I guess what you're asking is wehther or not man(1) works at all in Debian GNU/Hurd, of course it does <concussious>thanks! some have done it, clear linux (8yr?ago): no man(1) <damo22>it would be pretty irresponsible to have an official GNU OS project with no man(1) <concussious>well, i like man(1) enough that i rewrote kbd(4) from man(7) to mdoc(7) just to make apropos work better on freebsd. i only start x when I need a www browser, but i want to make apropos listings very elegant so more people appreciate traditional unix culture of manual pages. that said, i respect lots of computer tribes have different culture <concussious>i don't really understand this driver, but i understand man <concussious>so, intel's clear linux was the very fastest, i respect those guys don't like man(1) and hope they respect that we do <concussious>the hurd is very unique thinking also, so i didn't know if you guys only used texi, and maybe had developed a complete set of texinfos to replace man <solid_black>as I said, we don't have man pages of our own (at least none that I'm aware of) <solid_black>it's up to whoever puts together a complete system (based on the kernel, and lots of other software) to include man(1) and man pages, or not <youpi>i.e. it's up to the distribution <youpi>sure, just preferred to put the word on it :) (hi!)