IRC channel logs
2023-06-14.log
back to list of logs
<janneke>re: thread-join, we fixed a glibc-confusion problem, possibly glibc-2.35 may have leeked-in somewhere; re-building VMs to re-check <gabber>i hope this is the right place to ask about GNU Mach, too :) i've idiotically tried adding a new host to the Mach microkernel but i am not really used to using autotools that much. while my (indubitably simplicistic) aproach starts compiling, i run into a _Static_assert error -- i guess sizeof tests fails because they are tested the wrong platform. but i have no clue where this is coming from? any ideas? <gabber>the assert() fails in kern/mach_debug.server.c which is autogenerated (at least i think so) through a make target defined in Makefrag.am. i've started reading the autotools book but i'm not sure this is the most straight forward way to keep going -- so i've come here (: <gabber>i've extended --enable-platform in configure.ac and copied files (from i386 to riscv64) <luckyluke>gabber: are you porting gnumach to riscv? :) <gabber>digging a bit further i stumbled upon include/mach_debug/mach_debug.defs which i suspect creates the _Static_assert calls <gabber>luckyluke: i can't promise anything <gabber>and i won't -- but i've had this "how hard can it be" and i wanted to get my hands dirty with kernels <gabber>soooo... what are these "Matchmaker definitions" i've stumbled upon? what language are they written in? unfortunately duckduckgo is utterly useless when searching these terms <luckyluke>Iirc matchmaker is the language of the RPC definitons, in this case those handled by the kernel <luckyluke>They are used by MiG to generate some packing/unpacking code <gabber>RPC as in remote procedure call? <gabber>so this is written in a mach/mig special programming language? <luckyluke>it's rather just a definition language, you can define data types, structures, functions and a few attributes basically, but no code <luckyluke>it's the human-friendly definition of the function calls <luckyluke>and the main use is to generate the parsing code automatically, using mig <luckyluke>it should be quite arch-indipendent, we recently made it work on x86_64, so probably most of the work would be already done for another 64-bit arch <gabber>ah -- x86_64 has arrived? how cool! yes, maybe this makes my job much easier <gabber>i thought one of these .defs files was responsible for the _Static_assert check failing when building -- which does not seem to be defined anywhere? <luckyluke>it's still not fully functional we have a very early prototype of a debian/hurd system... but a lot of things work :) <luckyluke>probably this comes from the files generated by mig, they contain some static asserts about the message struct sizes <luckyluke>but how are you compiling it? do you already have a basic riscv64/ tree with arch-specific code?