IRC channel logs

<mark_weaver>xephyr is a much improved replacement for xnest. I'm not sure why anyone would bother with xnest anymore.

<atheia`>Hello Civodul

<atheia`>I was thinking of lending a hand with bugs tonight — should I simply browse them on the tracker and pick one that looks doable?

<civodul>hello atheia`

<civodul>yes, you could browse the tracker, that'd be great!

<atheia`>Aha, the URL — just what I was angling for :-) Thanks

<civodul>don't hestitate to ask for info if anything's unclear with the bugs

<civodul>i have to go, but i'll be back later today

<civodul>jmd: i can't reproduce your bug, but i think i know where it comes from

<civodul>(talking about today's bug report)

<civodul>jmd: could you try "git show 595801e | patch -p1 -R" and "make clean-go && make"?

<jmd>Just a second ...

<jmd>fails to build

<jmd>In unknown file:

<jmd> ?: 1 [scm-error misc-error #f ...]

<jmd>In ice-9/boot-9.scm:

<jmd> 106: 0 [#<procedure a00f440 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:97:6 (thrown-k . args)> misc-error ...]

<jmd>ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: In procedure #<procedure a00f440 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:97:6 (thrown-k . args)>:

<jmd>ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: missing interface for module (gnutls)

<civodul>right, but we're back to the previous problem

<jmd>Hmm.Yes there are two ...

<civodul>i guess "make -k" passes, right?

<civodul>exactly :-)

<jmd>It's odd that you cannot reproduce it. There's nothing unusual about my setup.

<civodul>ooh, i know

<civodul>i have Guile from git, and it has a fix for this particular problem

<civodul>so i get a non-fatal error message

<civodul>jmd: pushed a fix and replied by mail

<jmd>Yep. make -k works.

<jmd>OK. I've pulled your patch. I'll do a complete rebuild and report back tomorrow.

<civodul>i didn't push anything regarding the first bug though (gnutls)

<civodul>i'm waiting for feedback for that

<jmd>I'm unsure if the two bugs are related.

<civodul>they're not

<jmd>Oh I see your other mail now.

<jmd>I'll try your patch tomorrow.

<jmd>Bed time.

2013-12-04.log