IRC channel logs

<msglm>Hello there, I'm trying to work on some GPU accelerated guix work using rocm in a home computer, but I noticed that the rocm package definitions do not have gfx1100 as a supported architecture. Are there any plans to add this as a supported architecture? In theory it should be as simple as appending gfx1100 to the usual list of targets (like

<msglm>gfx1030 or gfx90a).

<msglm>If there are no plans, how would I go about compiling the toolchain along with libomp to support this architecture? Is there a macro of some kind to create the toolchain I can easily define?

<civodul>comrades, i’ve pushed ‘CODEOWNERS’ files on Codeberg, created teams…

<civodul>amazing

<civodul>i feel like living in the future

<civodul>better than flying cars!

<civodul>next step: CI

<rekado>are you dreaming of moving Guix from Savannah to Codeberg?

<civodul>possibly! you read in my mind :-)

<rekado>I bet this would make many people happy

<civodul>i think it could help address some of our problems: triaging, onboarding, CI, etc.

<civodul>yeah

<civodul>would you be one of them?

<rekado>I'm happy whenever the project does something that doesn't hurt old-timers but improves the experience for people born after 1890.

<rekado>so I'd be nodding in quiet approval

<civodul>heh, ok

<civodul>until then, we can see how that goes with smaller projects

<rekado>I can image there would be a number of concerns raised by those who prefer to keep things as they are.

<rekado>mostly boiling down to the hosting organization: FSF vs Codeberg e.V.

<rekado>I'm not looking forward to a discussion about this, so I hope that our experience will be overwhelmingly positive so we have good stories to tell.

<rekado>do you know anyone at Codeberg?

<civodul>no, i don’t

<civodul>i don’t really expect “FSF vs. Codeberg” discussions actually

<civodul>but yeah, we’ll see

<civodul>(plus i think we’d have all the reasons to view Codeberg e.V. as a sister org)

IRC channel logs

2024-11-29.log