IRC channel logs
2024-02-15.log
back to list of logs
<civodul>just printed a copy of the report to see what it’s like <civodul>the printer at work gives poor results for the cover <civodul>i asked whether we could have it “professionally printed”, we’ll see <rekado>civodul: it is only *now* that I finally got some time to read and write. <rekado>I’m looking at the pdf and I notice that page 18 has a bad URL underline that extends all the way to page 19 <rekado>civodul: I pushed a draft for the Perspectives section <rekado>I’d like to remove the blue from the headings <rekado>and add vertical space above each top-level heading <rekado>the umlaut in Max Delbrück looks a bit odd <civodul>i’m fine with you removing the blue and adding space <civodul>yeah i noticed, dunno if it’s Garamond Libre being weird <civodul>rekado: the “Perspectives” section is beautiful, thank you! <civodul>talking about the challenges to meet folks where they are is a great idea <civodul>this section is definitely Garamond-worthy <civodul>(parts i wrote might be more like Times New Roman-level :-)) <rekado>in section 2.3 the code examples … don’t look good <rekado>and we’ve got a few instances where hyperlinks are split across pages; that wouldn’t be a problem on its own, but the hyperlink underline and linkification extends across the footnote section and page number. <civodul>i’ve pushed a fix for the code snippets <civodul>for hyperlinks than span over two pages, i’m afraid there’s no much we can do <rekado>here’s something a little controversial: elephly.net/downies/0001-WIP.patch <rekado>changes highlight color to one of the colors in the cover; underline color to the blue in the cover illustration; uses humungous section numbers <civodul>should we keep Fira Sans for subsection headings? <civodul>re \hl, i wonder if it’s ‘guixlight’ is too dark for b&w printing (maybe it doesn’t matter though) <rekado>I’m not so sure about Fira Sans for the subsections <rekado>haven’t figured out a better subsection style, though, so I can’t offer a constructive step forward <rekado>good point about guixlight highlights; there is no lighter color in the cover illustration, but we could just make it less saturated. <civodul>anyway, these are minor issues, i’m happy with the result so far <rekado>the Personnel section looks a little odd <rekado>two things that stick out: the lowercase “independent” starting a list item; and the lack of a paragraph after the list. It just kinda ends. <rekado>there was also supposed to be a screenshot that doesn’t seem to be in the report