IRC channel logs


back to list of logs

<rekado>“debunk” is a bit of a strong word
<rekado>maybe “dispel” is better here
<rekado>“debunk” to me always has a whiff of dishonesty
<rekado>also: very bold to claim that the GWL has “matured” :D
<civodul>yeah i agree that "dispel" sounds milder and more appropriate
<civodul>GWL received new commits, so it has "matured" :-)
<civodul>this looks like a summary more than perspectives
<civodul>maybe that's okay though?
<rekado>the last sentence veers into perspective territory
<rekado>so I think it’s fine
<civodul>alright :-)
<civodul>it'd be nice to plot the level of expectation of editors over time
<rekado>gotta leave now, will be back in a couple hours
<civodul>np, thanks again!
***civodul is now known as civodul`
***civodul` is now known as civodul
<zimoun>civodul: what do you mean by: «zimoun, do you copy me?» ?
<civodul>hey zimoun!
<civodul>i was wondering if you were somehow reading this channel
<civodul>looks like you were not :-)
<zimoun>heh! No yesterday was a long day… as today. :-)
<zimoun>civodul, for relaxing on Friday when listening speakers, Konrad raised an interesting issue about OpenBLAS
<zimoun>which raises this weirdness
<civodul>weird indeed
<zimoun>maybe I did a mistake. It is late. :-)
<civodul>yeah, i don't know, but it doesn't sound great
<civodul>in your message you're looking at commits that Konrad didn't mention though, that's confusing
<zimoun>No, the issue of Konrad is one. And when investigating, I found this weirdness.
<zimoun>Well, if I am correct, many packages could be affected. And it is not related to the failure Konrad reported, I guess.
<civodul>ah ok
<civodul>one issue at a time :-)
<civodul>Konrad's commit is from Jan. 2020 and we have some, but not all the substitutes it seems
<zimoun>yeah, that’s why I started another thread. ;-) And commented to the issue in the correct thread, I hope.
<civodul>ah yes, i had overlooked that
<civodul>ah nice
<civodul> is scary
<rekado>yes, I think I reported it a while ago as well
<rekado>it builds more or less dependent on how many features the build node’s CPU supports
<zimoun>Hum, on one machine, my machine displays 0.3.9 and on another machine, I get an error (about (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (value (rust-1.52))) for guix time-machine --commit=4b1538e6ef -- show openblas.
<civodul>"guix time-machine --commit=7357b3d7a52eb5db1674012c50d308d792741c48 -- build openblas" works for me
<civodul>there are substitutes on ci.guix
<civodul>zimoun: did you fiddle with ~/.cache/guix/checkouts/ by hand?
<civodul>perhaps you could try "rm -rf ~/.cache/guix/checkouts", to be sure
<civodul>rekado: oh really?
<zimoun>civodul, about the checkout, I did nothing. It fails for me with --no-grafts --check.