<zimoun>I have not read all yet. However, I find really weird that almost all people around this topic speak about “Open”. But Open is not the key for reproducing. The key is twofold: lookup and capture all the computational stack. Otherwise, as much as Open it is, it is doomed. I have plenty of Open examples impossible to reproduce.
<civodul>zimoun: this report looks somewhat empty, no?
<civodul>the recommendations look rather vague and consensual to me
<civodul>(consensual is not a bad thing, but i mean there's nothing new here)
<zimoun>Empty, I do not know. Some sentence are weird: «As reproducibility is a relatively new topic» What?!? It is as old as Galileo :-)
<zimoun>civodul: my point is just that in “Open data” section, it is consensual, sure, but in the same time, it provides a message as if “Open“, share, etc, will fix the issue. It is just wrong and a clear misunderstanding of the issue. IMHO.
<zimoun>and it is an European Union publication. Potentially driving funds.