<civodul>zimoun: someone reported that the datefudge source tarball vanished...
<civodul>... and "guix lint -c archival datefudge" says it's not archived
<civodul>is it a case you already encountered before?
<civodul>it's annoying that our sophisticated machinery isn't helping when it should :-)
<zimoun>civodul, yes. Yesterday morning I was a bit upset that datefudge is not in Berlin or Bordeaux and not yet in Disarchive DB (because xz). Why do we have 2 build farms if we are not able to simply cover ‘guix pull’ and robustify?
<zimoun>Here, https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2021-09/msg00215.html I wrote «My question with duplication is about “long term storage of all the sources”. Not about building twice» and «Now Guix have 2 build farms so let consider it is a strength. :-) The question is how to exploit such strength by sharing the workload and have a better global scaling up (and not 2 independent