IRC channel logs
2021-08-02.log
back to list of logs
<rekado>today it’s my turn to ask a FAQ: <rekado>does anyone have a more recent tensorflow package? <rekado>I’ll try packaging tensorflow-lite now <civodul>(speaking of which, i'm still not done with pytorch, but i've never been this close) <rekado>I hope you can push pytorch over the finish line <rekado>one of these days I’ll also have to see if I can get keras to work. We have a python-keras package, and I’ll need *something* for CRAN packages that want to talk to keras. <civodul>oh! looks like something that could save us <civodul>looks like folks at Google feel the need to have an escape hatch <rekado>the bazel stuff for tensorflow is rather complex. I fear this converter may not be smart enough to deal with it. <rekado>I think their need for cmake is due to the desire to support building on Windows. <PurpleSym>Do we actually have a proper GPU runtime like ROCm for Guix somewhere? (I presume everyone is running NVIDIA/CUDA anyway…?) <civodul>PurpleSym: we don't, but we were discussing it the other day, and it seems like it'd be welcome <civodul>rekado: i suppose Bazel supports Windows, but my guess is that Bazel still lacks momentum outside Google and so they may prefer CMake for their "open source products" <rekado># tensorflow-lite uses find_package for this package, so override the system <rekado># installation and build from source instead. <civodul>there are direct and indirect deps, and also forks of the same thing (like XNNPACK/QNNPACK)