IRC channel logs
2021-07-05.log
back to list of logs
<zimoun>thanks for the Python 2 removals push :-) <zimoun>civodul: your stagiaire is making progress about repro2docker, right? :-) <civodul>it's ridiculous, but we can do like they propose <dstolfa>civodul: i will be trying guix-jupyter on a foreign distro soon, so i'll let you know if i run into the same problem i did on my local guix system <civodul>dstolfa: ah yes, i need to take a look <zimoun>civodul: hehe! Nix vs Guix, again :-) A kind of FAQ could be worth, maybe. <zimoun>pff! I am checking the recent patches by Jean-Baptiste <zimoun>arf! A person in my lab had the good idea to turn off the machine I use… Paf! restart all the process. <zimoun>I could be nice to have an option something like ’-K’ to avoid to redo all from the begin. It would be also helpful when developping <civodul>there's no way you can suspend and resume a build <civodul>and it would be a serious security risk if you did so <dstolfa>civodul: still getting the timeout, even on an ubuntu 20.04 server... i'm either setting something up wrong, or something is broken <zimoun>civodul: I am half-convinced… The security is not an issue because the user know what it does and yes they can shoot in their foot. However, it could be complicated to start from a previous build and only build the difference. <civodul>zimoun: that would need a longer explanation, but the whole security model of the shared store would collapse if this were allowed <civodul>that amounts to giving right access to the store to all users <civodul>dstolfa: i can reproduce the problem <civodul>the weird thing is that the Guix kernel does start, but everything looks as if it did not receive any message from Notebook <dstolfa>yeah, that's the same thing i'm having here <civodul>in the meantime, you could try to time-machine to an older commit to try to see when breakage happened <dstolfa>civodul: i can confirm that f1e0e5fde34ff0e882247498ecf78106c73284d6 is good <dstolfa>so the regression must have happened in the last month <zimoun>civodul: why? if a seed is added to tweak the output hash, I do not see the issue. Maybe I miss something. <dstolfa>civodul: nevermind, i launched the python kernel by accident! <zimoun>Arf! Rebased the v2 version and now test suite fails… after <too-long-time>. Anyway! <dstolfa>68c9e0a56e008f19427bd213cf5b24bdd8fe5922 is also bad <dstolfa>this seems to be a very old regression <dstolfa>hmm, i wonder if i'm doing the time-machine thing right :) <dstolfa>right, i was accidentally running it on the current commit, was using time-machine wrong <dstolfa>civodul: 68c9e0a56e008f19427bd213cf5b24bdd8fe5922 is a good commit <dstolfa>if you want to bisect, that's the place to start probably <dstolfa>i'll try to narrow it down a bit more <civodul>dstolfa: awesome, thanks! you can send that to the issue <drakonis>hahaha welp, i guess nix vs guix will begin to come up a lot more often now