<rekado_>civodul: should I propose it on guix-devel and ask for the colour of the bikeshed to be discussed? <civodul>which bikeshed are you referring to? <civodul>OTOH we don't have all the options yet :-) <rekado_>I suppose I could include a patch to get the ball rolling <civodul>i'd like to make options->transformations public, too <civodul>which means tweaking the interface (removing 'store') <civodul>the last bit (fonts, etc.) is something we know very well :-) *civodul .oO let's hope that person doesn't register guixkill.org <civodul>at least we're not claiming to be "the future of linux apps" <rekado_>yeah, I don’t like these single-purpose sites that collect criticism of a tool <rekado_>it just comes across as … unconstructive, angry, reactionary even. <rekado_>but I thought: there are some similarities with flatpak and Docker <civodul>yeah, and even if they have a point, it's very name-and-shame and worse ("kill") <civodul>we've been lumping them in the same category <rekado_>and a lot of the problems are thus the same, too <civodul>they use a different marketing strategy: "linux apps" vs. "containers" <rekado_>e.g. unpatched dependencies, lack of transparency, etc ***rekado_ is now known as rekado