IRC channel logs
2026-01-16.log
back to list of logs
<lloda>i think if scheme had been designed with multiple values from the beginning srfi-71 would be built in and srfi-8 wouldn't exist <identity>SRFI 11 is used by R^{6,7}RS, and is much less confusing that SRFI 71 <lloda>and srfi 11 wouldn't exist either <ArneBab>I’ve always used srfi-11 until now, but srfi-71 looks much neater. <ray1729>I started using srfi-71 after someone mentioned it here, but in retrospect I prefer the srfi-11 approach as it's more explicit <shawnw>srfi-8's receive is Common Lisp multiple-value-bind with a better name. I prefer let-values though.