***chris is now known as Guest2081
<leth>Is there a way to make a syntax-case access a let binding rather than a top level binding using with-syntax? ***chris is now known as Guest4234
***Guest4234 is now known as chrislck
***chris is now known as Guest1534
***chris is now known as Guest432
***chris is now known as Guest379
<apteryx>how could I match a sexp like '(define-public name (package (field ...) ...)) *or* '(define-public name (hidden-package (package (field ...) ...))) ? <apteryx>do I need two patterns, or there's something clever I can do to keep only one pattern? <apteryx>er, the second sexp should be like the first one, but with an extra (hidden-package encapsulating (package ... <apteryx>hm, nevermind, i got it right the first time ;-) <apteryx>seems (identifier *** pat) may be it <apteryx>not sure how to use it though; (match '(a (b (c (d)))) (('a (res *** 'c) ('d)) res)) fails to match ***dostoevsky9 is now known as dostoevsky