<haugh[m]>Hi everyone. I'm interested in shorthand like Gauche's accessor/lambda syntax and wondering if there's any kind of consensus on using such syntax. <haugh[m]>Not sure if appropriate for this room. Thanks for your time. ***alMalsamo is now known as littlebobeep
<tohoyn>daviid: I need to access the GIBaseInfo objects associated with the argument types and return types (type-desc's) of a function <tohoyn>daviid: the reason is that I need the namespaces and the base names of the argument and result types <tohoyn>daviid: Is there any way I could obtain the base info from an instance of <gobject-class>? <tohoyn>daviid: <gi-struct>, <gi-enum>, and <gi-flags>, too <tohoyn>daviid: could these classes contain a namespace slot as <function> does? <tohoyn>daviid: it seems that some functions have arguments of type void, e.g. gtk-widget-add-tick-callback. is this an error? <wingo>civodul: how did you like ,optimize-cps <civodul>wingo: heya, i haven't played with it yet <civodul>yeah hadn't even realized it had made it into 3.0.8, silly me <civodul>there are times where i missed it so i'll be sure to use it <wingo>it's the same level of expressiveness as ,x but with less confusing naming and control-flow <civodul>hmm i get "While executing meta-command: In procedure +: Wrong type argument in position 1: #f" <wingo>maybe it has more bugs too :) <civodul>it's broken for me in: guix shell -C guile -- guile <wingo>my guix is too old for that... <tohoyn>daviid: we may have discussed this before, but why is <gtk-text-iter> not defined after you do (gi-import-by-name "Gtk" "TextIter")? <tohoyn>daviid: the procedure call returns a gi-struct object ***Server sets mode: +ntz
***civodul` is now known as civodul
***RMSBach is now known as RSBach