<dsmith>ninety-nine guilers are here in the chan <dsmith>if one of those guilers should happen to /part <dsmith>ninety-eight guilers are here in the chan <apteryx>hello! is there a way to programatically retrieve the source code of a procedure? <RhodiumToad>in theory there's procedure-source, but I don't see it returning anything other than #f <manumanumanu>apteryx: you could define it yourself, if it is supposed to be used in a system where you don't need to retrieve source of built-ins <manumanumanu>either using applicable structs where you store the source and the lambda (and some identifier-syntax trickery to make recursive calls fast), or by some hash-table thingie (probably less robust. proceduce equality is a bit weird due to... eh... beta-reduction??) <apteryx>RhodiumToad: eh, that's my experience with procedure-source as well <RhodiumToad>manumanumanu: I think you can just explicitly set the source property on a procedure, too <RhodiumToad>(set-procedure-property! foo 'source whatever) makes a subsequent (procedure-source foo) return whatever <RhodiumToad>at least by default the compiler doesn't seem to set that, I don't know if there's maybe a knob for it <manumanumanu>apteryx: if you want to, you could define a module that redefines define to do what RhodiumToad suggests. That would be the best solution. <daviid>i've pushed a few important patches to g-golf, overriding some gdk-4 clipboard related functions (methods) and added a clipboard.scm gtk-4 example, to the devel branch - pretty cool the clipboard example ... :) <civodul>hmm, can't #:re-export srfi-1 'delete' without getting "overrides core binding" warnings at run time <civodul>i had forgotten about that one, thanks RhodiumToad! <civodul>i was close to being creative and use something other than 'delete' as a syntactic keyword for my macro :-) <taw10>manumanumanu: An 'applicable struct' solves a similar problem for me, but I could never find any documentation on how to create them. Do you have any pointers? <leoprikler>In GOOPS you can inherit <procedure>, dunno about C <taw10>leoprikler: Thanks. But when creating a new "<myprocedure>", where does the procedure body go? <civodul>taw10: i don't think applicable structs are documented, but see <parameter> in boot-9.scm <taw10>civodul, manumanumanu: Interesting, thanks! <RhodiumToad>taw10: in goops, you can inherit <applicable-struct> or <applicable-struct-with-setter> ***KindOne_ is now known as KindOne
<civodul>by any chance, does someone have a reader and/or pretty-printer that can deal with comments? <wingo>civodul: what do you mean? which returns comments in the result? <wingo>i don't have one but it should be reasonable to build from read.scm <civodul>i was looking for a quick'n'dirty way to hack something atop 'read' <civodul>but it's probably safer to just hack 'read' directly *wingo has an ,optimize-cps repl command, that prints in a standard-ish form kinda like llvm ir