<chrislck>is there an opposite for (use-modules) ? ***scs is now known as Guest87482
<apteryx>spk121: the one equivalent to ,compile at the REPL I guess <apteryx>What's the modern, best practice way to raise an exception in Scheme? <apteryx>reading the manual, that'd be raise-exception. <apteryx>What are continuing exception handlers typically used for? Report about an error, then let the exception bubble up? I'm a bit puzzled why this mode is the default. It seems more common that an exception handler should abort the error condition. Am I missing something? :-) <apteryx>ah, srfi-34 adds more convenient sugar on top of these primitives <leoprikler>chrislck: there is no unuse-module, that'd be silly. If you need to overwrite an established binding, you can simply define it, otherwise try to limit your imports with #:select or use #:prefix to rename them <leoprikler>apteryx: not sure what exactly you mean, but I believe the default exception handler terminates the program (or lets you backtrace when in REPL) ***scs is now known as Guest87665
<chrislck>leopriker: it's not silly. I want to test some old code which does (use-module ...) want wish to 'reset' the environment from time to time. it's ok there's no need to write the test. ***apteryx_ is now known as apteryx
***rekado_ is now known as rekado
<rekado>dustyweb: in a new project using webutils I found that delete-session does not reliably delete the session cookie. <rekado>I haven’t been able to find a minimal example yet, but I’ll keep trying. <RhodiumToad>with-output-to-string isn't supposed to affect subprocess output <mwette>maybe try open-pipe rather than system <pinoaffe>RhodiumToad: ok, that makes sense, but it's still counterintuitive imo (I've encountered several others that tried (with-output-to-string (system "blarg"))) ***scs is now known as Guest44764
***scs is now known as Guest6425