***catonano_ is now known as catonano
***sneek_ is now known as sneek
***sneek_ is now known as sneek
***ecraven- is now known as ecraven
<tohoyn>daviid, str1ngs: do you have experience about publishing software on Savannah? <daviid>str1ngs, tohoyn, I just pushed aother series of patches that shouldn't affect your respective code, but yet ... when ever possible, please pull, make, check and let me know if there is a problem ... <RhodiumToad>isn't the problem that they want you to use "gplv3 or any later version", not just "gplv3 only" ? <tohoyn>RhodiumToad: quote from the license header: "... either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any <tohoyn>RhodiumToad: do you mean the Savannah project page? <RhodiumToad>at the link you posted, under "Registration Details", it says "License: Other license (Most of the software is licensed under GPL v3. The documentation is licensed under GFDL-1.3. Some library modules are licensed under LGPL v3. ) " <daviid>the header lacks a copyright though ... but i'll let RhodiumToad helping you ... not that they will check every file and they all must be 'ok' wrt to their license policy ... <RhodiumToad>try "... Most of the software is licensed under GPL v3 or later. The documentation is licensed under GFDL-1.3. Some library modules are licensed under LGPL v3 or later." <RhodiumToad>(I don't know if the GFDL has an "or later" but if it does, include that too) <RhodiumToad>g-golf's page says it's lgpl v3 or later, so that's ok <RhodiumToad>just remember that any time you mention the name of a license, always include or not include the "or later" part according to whether the thing being licensed does in fact specify that or not <RhodiumToad>i.e. treat "gpl v3" and "gplv3 or later" as if they were completely different licenses <RhodiumToad>note that I'm basically just guessing here based on the other guy's responses <tohoyn>daviid: I checked the new G-Golf with Theme-D-Golf. it worked fine. ***logicmoo is now known as dmiles
<tohoyn>is it so that Guile bytecode files should not be stripped? ***jao is now known as Guest58351
<dsmith-work>Only portions that are needed are loaded. But when you need it, it's there (like debug info) <heisenberg-25>Hi, quick question about using automake tools for guile. After running GUILE_PKG([3.0 2.9 2.2]) in configure.ac, the $(GUILE_EFFECTIVE_VERSION) is empty in my Makefile.am. what am I doing wrong? or do I have to re-run GUILE_PKG([3.0 2.9 2.2]) in the make file too <civodul>heisenberg-25: "2.9" was never a valid effective version <civodul>in Makefile.am, you can do: GUILE_EFFECTIVE_VERSION = @GUILE_EFFECTIVE_VERSION@ <str1ngs> heisenberg-25: $(GUILE_EFFECTIVE_VERSION) should expand if you use GUILE_PKG . make sure you run autoreconf -ivf and ./configure again. <dsmith-work>manumanumanu: I was very plesantly surprised that Rust has such a capable macro system. But.. Icky too. Because it can only use valid rust tokens. <manumanumanu>yeah! I have seen some nice uses for it. Giving rust tco, for example :D <heisenberg-25>civodul: I set it and it still giving me issues. The error I am getting is during make install, it is failing with "mkdir: /usr/local/guile: Permission denied, mkdir: /usr/local/guile: No such file or directory". <heisenberg-25>so I thought the $(GUILE_EFFECTIVE_VERSION) might be empty as I have set moddir=$(prefix)/share/guile/site/$(GUILE_EFFECTIVE_VERSION) <heisenberg-25>so $(info GUILE_VERSION is $(GUILE_EFFECTIVE_VERSION)) prints the correct version, so the $(GUILE_EFFECTIVE_VERSION) is being set :/ <str1ngs>heisenberg-25: probably in your case you want to do sudo make install <dsmith-work>I think if you are in the "staff" group on Debian you can scribble there. <heisenberg-25>str1ngs: I fixed it by changing the dest installation. Thanks :) <str1ngs> heisenberg-25 no problem, I'm assuming you changed it to a prefix you have write access to? <roptat>hi, I'm trying to parse a big xml document (200MB) with guile, and using xml->sxml is not practical, as it is taking forever (and currently taking 3GB of memory...). I see there's a (sxml ssax) module that sounds more promising as it could allow me to process the xml file without having to load it all in memory first <roptat>there's an introduction to it in the manual, but there's no example or documentation of the function, only a list of them. Is there any other place I could find some information about how to use this module? <civodul>roptat: (guix import snix) uses it if it can help <dsmith-work>As the documentation says: "SAX parsers are more efficient, but much harder to user" <roptat>especially when they are not documented :p <roptat>I'm looking at the code for (sxml simple) <roptat>thanks for the help, I think I'll be able to do what I want :) ***jonsger1 is now known as jonsger
<rgherdt>heisenberg-25: regarding guile I don't know, but take a look at biwascheme <hugo>Is there some good alternative to parameters for multi threaded programs? I want to be able to change the value in a limited scope, but still being able to override the global from any thread. <hugo>I know I can roll my own, but something well thought through might work better