IRC channel logs
2019-10-29.log
back to list of logs
***Server sets mode: +nt
<str1ngs>daviid: right I get it. I guess I'm just being pragmatic and think that in term. typelibs still even for C++ is still more usable now then even SCM_DEFINE and guile's dynamic FFI. I will ponder your input some more. It's an intriguing and interesting discussion and problem to solve. <dsmith-work>The thing with C++ that concerns me is exceptions. And how that fits in with Guile catch/throw or the r{6,7}rs stuff. <str1ngs>though is it not normal for C++ libraries to a extern a C interface? <str1ngs>I prefer C to C++ myself as well. and maybe when I reach scheme nirvana I can forgo that too :) <dsmith-work>Though $DAYJOB as been mostly Python for the past 4-5 years. *jcowan is a monoglot speaker and a polyglot programmer <jcowan>I have no idea what my "native" programming language might be <daviid>dsmith-work: yes, c++ exception is the problem, and vigra_c, imo, does the right thing <daviid>str1ngs: most c++ lib do not have a C api, which is why it is a 'problem' for us, schemers, till a genius writes an automatic c++ to c wrapper or a libffi++ that takes care of c++ exceptions ... <jcowan>Fortunately, it's a whole lot of "scripting" languages that can't talk to C++ <str1ngs>I think swig attempts that :P. but not exactly dynamic either <jcowan>Does anyone know how Clasp does it? C++ is its native language <daviid>dsmith-work: yes, that vigra_c is, imo, the right way to handle the problem, but it needs someone to write it 'maually' ... <mwette>the nyacc ffi-helper is SWIG for Guile <daviid>jcowan: yes, but if we could, we'd have octave and opencv 'in our hands' ... <jcowan>Chicken gave up on Swig a long time ago, I'm not even sure exactly why <daviid>mwette: bcan nyacc ffi-helper provide c++ binding? if so, does it make guile c++ exceptions aware? <mwette>daviid: no, C++ is too hard to parse, I looked into C++ parsing for a bit but decided too hard and I have little experience w/ C++ <jcowan>the only thing you should parse C++ is a C++ compiler. <nisstyre>does guile have a way of writing hash literals, better than doing (alist->hash-table '( (foo . bar) )) ? <nisstyre>but it looks like the srfi is not recommended <nisstyre>I'm trying to make it easy to configure a bunch of values <nisstyre>maybe I should just create my own macro for that <mwette>Right: clang is able to dump a parse tree. One could try that but it will be a moving target in terms for parse tree format. <mwette>isn't hash-comma (#,) used by syntax case? <dsmith-work>nisstyre: fwiw, The racket hash read syntax seems to just be a macro and an alist. <daviid>dsmith-work: the vigra_c author is the author of vigracket, which is why he wrote vigra_c in the first place :) <dsmith-work>That name is always looking like something getting past spam filters..