***x1n4u- is now known as x1n4u
***PuercoPope is now known as PuercoPop
<webshinra>hey people, is-their a way to get good error tracability when executing scheme from c ? <webshinra>I mean, i get things like «(#f No applicable method for ~S in call ~S (#<<generic> expanded-sequence (1)> (expanded-sequence (normal-operation . #<<animation-sequence> 2927cc0>)))» <webshinra>but that's not really helpfull without knowing where it have been raised <wingo>webshinra: generally that info comes from the pre-unwind handler <wingo>catch instantiations have a post-unwind and/or a pre-unwind handler <wingo>from c you can use SCM_API SCM scm_handle_by_proc_catching_all (void *, SCM, SCM); <wingo>use scm_c_catch with scm_handle_by_message_noexit as pre-unwind handler <dsmith>Well, dsmith-work won't be joining us for a while. My last day was yesterday. A surprise for me! <dsmith>Anyone need someone with 30+ years embedded C experience? <dsmith>Well Fouey. I was going to upgrade sneek to 2.2, but it seem my gcc is too old! 4.6.3 <wingo>does guix have builds for that one? <dsmith>I have really limted space at the moment. ABout 300M free "disk" <sneek>Linux beaglebone 3.8.13-bone47 #1 SMP Fri Apr 11 01:36:09 UTC 2014 armv7l GNU/Linux <webshinra>one thing I really love with scheme is the visuel aspect of the code at a macroscopic level <daviid>dsmith: very sorry for you, bad news :(