IRC channel logs
2016-01-06.log
back to list of logs
<wingo>but yes, it does seem that read-line is the right thing. <civodul>we should probably audit the other uses of 'read-line*' in there <civodul>oh we were also accepting LF instead of CRLF in responses <civodul>wingo: do you think there are servers out there than send LF instead of CRLF? <wingo>i think so but i don't have data atm <wingo>but i have a vague recollection that they exist <mark_weaver>civodul: fwiw, my opinion: I wouldn't spend time trying to make LF-only an error in that case. <civodul>it's just that i was spending time on fixing the other issue ;-)