***alandipert_ is now known as alandipert
<cluck>zacts: we're not chocolates, we're guilders. men of guile! <daviid>hello guilers! civodul, mark_weaver unless you object, i'm going to release guile-gnome: make distcheck fails, but it does not fail the [1] test, it fails to run the test. the tarball is ok [i mean perfectly ok] and the user who will use it, once all dependencies statisfied, will configure/make/make check/make install without problem [unknown bug of course], wdyt? <civodul>daviid: that's probably OK, but Andy is the maintainer, no? <civodul>i've never done anything in guile-gnome so i'm not really entitled :-) <daviid>civodul: i understand: note that the logic of make distcheck is strictly identical to the one of guile [running tests from _build, _inst ...], which is why i did ask for some help, and your opinion now. for the record, andy already told me i could release [a while ago], from strict guile-gnome code point of view, but he was not aware [neither did i] there was a small make distcheck problem *daviid should [deeply] study the autotools chain, in this life hopefully :) <davexunit>civodul: do you think skribilo's outline-mode style markup would be suitable for writing blog posts and such, for use with a static site generator? <civodul>ISTR that wingo had written an org parser <civodul>perhaps it would be better for the input syntax <davexunit>I want to write blog posts in org-mode, but without any pure guile method of converting it to html, I'm hesitant. <davexunit>I could use emacs batch mode, but I don't know if org-mode will give me what I want. HTML sans the <html><head>...</head>...</html> stuff <civodul>perhaps it's in guile-present or something <davexunit>I can adapt this and write blog posts in org-mode now, maybe. :) <davexunit>as you can see, I'm going down a bit of a rabbit hole here, but I'm going to see if I can't quickly hack together a simple static site generator. <davexunit>ah, it's in february. that gives me some time. ;) ***fangism-zzzz is now known as fangism
<paroneayea><davexunit> I want to write blog posts in org-mode, but without any pure guile method of converting it to html, I'm hesitant. <paroneayea>1) org-mode has a really nice representation of its own syntax used when exporting <paroneayea>you can walk over it and do all sorts of things with it <paroneayea>it used to include a "generic" xml tree export of the file, not sure if that's still there <paroneayea>you could also easily make an sexp one if you'd prefer <davexunit>I'd need to use emacs batch mode, or re-implement that parser. <paroneayea>emacs -nw -q --batch (or whatever): faster than python and many other languages <davexunit>I would like to avoid relying on an external program, but I may have no choice. <paroneayea>2) clearly you should run it through guilemacs ;) <davexunit>I might have no choice but to need some external programs <davexunit>for example, if I were to do source code highlighting, pygments is the way to go. <paroneayea>davexunit: emacs' html export does syntax highlighting natively <davexunit>can org export to html without producing a full document? <davexunit>I just want some html that I toss into a template. <paroneayea>you could export to a full document, and hey, you have xhml processing tools right? <paroneayea>you can just grab the document portion of the body <ijp>if you were going that route, you'd be better off tweakig the exporter directly <paroneayea>ijp: yes I agree.. hence my worst comes to worst ;) <davexunit>I also worry about the html coming with a bunch of inline CSS that I won't want. <davexunit>the world needs guile-markdown, but that's a bridge too far right now. <sneek>Not as far as I can remember.