IRC channel logs
2023-04-19.log
back to list of logs
<fltrz>anyone familiar with metamath? <fltrz>I understand the verifier itself, but not the exact formalization in set.mm <fltrz>I'm working on a proof (using mmj2), and got quite far, but I keep getting stumped on an embarrasingly fundamental step: proving a positive integer is a natural number <fltrz>basically how do I prove |- ( ( A e. ZZ /\ 1 <_ A ) -> A e. NN ) ? <fltrz>I'm wondering if I'm really supposed to drill down below the ZZ>= constructs? <fltrz>oh I see, I'm supposed to use eluz2 <aggi>fltrz: an axiomatic statement cannot be "proven"; you may place any amount of apples on your desk, count them, and consider it _evident_ <river>i don't quite agree, you can prove an axiom by invoking the axiom <stikonas[m]>Then it's not am axiom but theorem in your logical system <stikonas>oh, if you mean the same axiom, not some other axiom...