<civodul>or (gnu packages linux) if it relies on Linux (the kernel) interfaces/syscalls
<ecraven>civodul: lint says nex/packages/dstat.scm:12:12: dstat-0.7.3: the source file name should contain the package name, but the uri obviously contains the package name? any idea what that is about?
<ecraven>I think it works on other systems, based on python
<civodul>ecraven: the base name of the source is "v0.9.3.tar.gz", hence the warning
<civodul>ecraven: cool! re php, maybe davexunit (or was it someone else?) has the beginning of a recipe
<ng0>and frequently there's also https://ptpb.pw/1ogy . should I post to the bugs list about this to track it, or is the problem just a minor one?
<ecraven>civodul: there is one on github that should work, I hope I'll have some time to work on it monday or tuesday
<ecraven>I'd like to add a php-fpm service too, and make it work with nginx
<ng0>so I thought I'm adding some more applications before I start working on system services etc, I started to work something out for hiawatha and stagit yesterday, essentially to be able to be my own example case and replace gentoo on the server with guixsd. after those it only needs services I need to write.. I guess no one is working on hiawatha and I don't do unnecessary work with that?
<ng0>an optional wallpaper package would do it, i think
<ng0>i know about those in kde, but i don't know about gnome
<ng0>we are discussing about developing a guix publish/pull method into gnunet-fs .. theoretically at the moment, done by people with more insight into gnunet it could be easier than from inside guix project. i know it's at the end of the roadmap for guix, but maybe we can advance that in part time.
<civodul>rodion: the woof URL seems to be currently unreachable
<Pof>I have a question: which is more KISS, Parabola or GuixSD?
<bavier>Pof: kinda depends on what you consider "simple"
<paroneayea>Pof: what bavier said. If you're willing to consider from the perspective of what's most probably most familiar if you came from other GNU/Linux distributions, Parabola is simpler. But if you're looking for "elegance", I'd say GuixSD.
<ng0>hm... is there a graphics card which just works with 3d acceleration without any further settings, or do I have to construct the entire xorg config file in the config.scm when I add only the card? my pitcairn ati card is a bit slow without extra settings
<Pof>paroneayea: what makes you say GuixSD is elegant?
<ng0>does someone have an config.scm with (service) xorg-configuration-file and specified drivers at hand? I'm a bit at loss for a quick start for tue system which needs it.
<ng0>I bricked my computer.. then I fixed it and gnome being slow by replacing the older ATI cards which require blobs with an even older card of Nvidia which does not require a blob... nvidia isn't that bad :D