<sprang>also, the download filename is a pretty long string again (for "guix download" case). looks like passing "#:abbreviation basename" to progress-proc in build/download.scm restores the previous behavior
<rekado_>(heh, sorry about the changing names. Still using IRC via browser at work, because ports are still closed.)
<rekado_>davexunit: I think it's not a very big problem. I think the problem is that git rebase isn't very convenient going back and forth. He said he's okay with sending out one polished patch in the end.
<davexunit>guess some people really don't like non-GitHub workflows, though.
<rekado_>there really isn't that much of a difference between email and Github workflows. You can work in a branch and stack commit after commit, but before sending it out for review you squash the commits.
<Steap>don't people rework their patches on Github ?
<rekado_>even many Github workflows require squashing commits.
<Steap>The only difference is that not using github is easier
<davexunit>Steap: yes, with the added grossness of having to force push to a remote git branch
<davexunit>I prefer the separation of version control system from patch review.
<davexunit>hopefully someone will get a chance to take a look at qemu's patches tool