<Fulax>do you think to allow #~ escapes within #$ escapes ?
<bavier>civodul: there are some packages that need to reference particular versions of packages as inputs, but can keep that version reference confined to the inputs list, with a generic reference to the name later. With gexps, would one need to use the versioned package name everwhere it is referenced?
<civodul>Fulax: i haven't thought much about it, but i don't see any use case
<civodul>bavier: gexps shouldn't change anything in the basic paradigm
<civodul>they won't be used for packages in the short term
<civodul>but in the longer term, that would allow you to do things like this in 'arguments':