IRC channel logs

<daviid>later tell bootchk fwiw, I have just added and pushed (to the devel branch) a test to the test-suite, which properly calls gi-array->scm for both zero terminated and fixed sized arrays of gobject instances

<daviid>sneek later tell bootchk fwiw, I have just added and pushed (to the devel branch) a test to the test-suite, which properly calls gi-array->scm for both zero terminated and fixed sized arrays of gobject instances

<sneek>Will do.

<humm>I’d like for PR merge commits to include not only the PR number (“(#17)”) in the commit message, but the PR’s URI (a trailer “Link: https://codeberg.org/guile/guile/pulls/17”)

<humm>s/not only/not/

<old>why is sysconf not exposed to Guile

<old>that and other things like confstr

<dsmith>humm, How did make check go?

<sneek>Welcome back dsmith!!

<humm>dsmith: there’s some few things that need skipping and some that need other patching; I didn’t get all tests to run through yet

<humm>dsmith: while doing that I found that on OpenBSD, (spawn) doesn’t work in a readline-activated REPL, somehow: https://okturing.com/src/15883/body

<dsmith>Is that using gnu readline, or a bsd readline-look-alike ?

<humm>right, the latter

<humm>this is my current `git diff`: https://okturing.com/src/15885/body

<rlb>humm: perhaps also see the top of ./check-guile in case you need to run single tests, etc.

<humm>nice, I started doing make …/….log

<rlb>You may also have seen, but you can also run the built guile via "meta/guile ...".

<rlb>meta/uninstalled-env is also available

<humm>yes, I did discover meta/

<humm>and gdbinit

<mwette>janneke: Did you receive my email response to your comment on the email list? Try "gcc -std=c99 -pedantic-errors switch.c".

<mwette>sneek, later tell janneke: Did you receive my email response to your comment on the email list? Try "gcc -std=c99 -pedantic-errors switch.c".

<sneek>Okay.

<rlb>ArneBab: I think #8 might all be in main now (just cherry-picked and pushed, the remaining bits).

<rlb>thanks

<dsmith>sneek, botsnack

<sneek>:)

<rlb>ArneBab: oh, wait -- looks like the NEWS "thanks" changes were to the wrong version?

<humm>most tests are independent of their cwd, but popen expects to be run in builddir; maybe that’s fine

<humm>popen.test

<janneke>sneek: later tell mwette: yes i got your reply, thanks! so it's actually a bug/feature of gcc to accept this, fair enough!

<sneek>janneke, you have 1 message!

<sneek>janneke, mwette says: Did you receive my email response to your comment on the email list? Try "gcc -std=c99 -pedantic-errors switch.c".

<sneek>Okay.

<janneke>sneek: ?

<janneke>sneek: botsnack

<sneek>:)

<janneke>ACTION will (attempt to) write a thoughtful reply tomorrow

IRC channel logs

2025-11-12.log