IRC channel logs

<lechner>mwette / Hi, would you remind me where cdata-set! got its argument order, please? I am trying to remember it. Thanks!

<sneek>lechner, you have 1 message!

<sneek>lechner, mwette says: I've added license to guile-saapp (to become guile-freezer)

<lechner>mwette / also thank you for your work on guile-freezer. I'll gladly wait

<mwette>lechner: cdata-set! comes from array-set! ; I was trying to be consistent with Guile

<lechner>mwette / okay, thanks! just asking

<lechner>mwette / as for the LGPL, I have been writing all my Guile code under GPLv3+. Should I also go with LGPL?

<lechner>Hi, how did bytevector-copy! end up being so different in r7 compared to r6?

<lechner>mwette / Hi, can (cdata) set! individual array elements? As in struct utmp's ut_addr_v6, https://bpa.st/FEMQ

<mwette>sneek: later tell lechner, (cdata-set! foo 42 'ut_addr_v6 1)

<sneek>Will do.

<old>anyway to have interned strings?

<old>For fast strings comparison

<identity>old: you mean symbols?

<ieure>Pretty sure they mean strings.

<identity>that was aimed at "interned strings", not at "strings"

<identity>as in, symbols are pretty much "interned strings with fast comparison"

<old>I guess I could do string->symbol

<old>that would be the less friction path

<lechner>yeah

<sneek>lechner, you have 1 message!

<sneek>lechner, mwette says: (cdata-set! foo 42 'ut_addr_v6 1)

<lechner>mwette / Thanks! Being insecure about crossing multiple levels, I first used cdata-ref on the 'ut_addr_v6 component before changing the array values via (cdata-set! [carray] [value] [index])

<veqq>What is this "you have one message" from / how does itork?

<identity>veqq: you can leave messages for users that are not online/not around, mention sneek and type "later tell $nickname $message"

<identity>sneek: later tell veqq like this

<sneek>Will do.

<veqq>Cool!

<sneek>Welcome back veqq, you have 1 message!

<sneek>veqq, identity says: like this

<veqq>Thank you for telling me!

<rlb>veqq: you can also "/msg sneek help" if you like iirc.

<old>sneek: botsnack

<sneek>:)

<dsmith>sneek, ?

<dsmith>sneek?

<dsmith>sneek, sneek?

<sneek>From what I understand, Sneek is sneek: Sneek is sneek: chain reaction

<dsmith>Nah

<dsmith>sneek, sneek is a good bot

<sneek>Understood.

<dsmith>sneek, botsnack

<sneek>:)

<old>sneek, sneek?

<sneek>Last time I checked Sneek is forgetful

<dsmith>sneek, sneek?

<sneek>sneek is mysterious.

<dsmith>sneek, sneek?

<sneek>I could be wrong, but Sneek is bicoastal.

<dsmith>sneek, sneek?

<sneek>Someone once said Sneek is forgetful

<dsmith>sneek, sneek?

<sneek>Last time I checked sneek is a good bot

<dsmith>Yes indeed

<sneek>ACTION wags

IRC channel logs

2025-05-27.log