<daviid>str1ngs: i pushed a few patches so g-golf now supports glist returned values, when the glist type-tag is 'interface and the interface GI info type tag is 'object - see the commit log for a better explanation <daviid>i'll have to enhance this so glist are also possible for 'in 'inout args <daviid>then, i'll have to enhance this so it works for other glist data types (int, guint ...) but i will do so 'on demand', that is when we reach a case that shows a need, because most of the time, afaict, glist are used to list gobject subclass instances - it will be easy to fix these other cases 'on demand' anyway <civodul>heisenberg-25: i haven't heard about one <heisenberg-25>civodul: Yeah, I have looked at the gnu guile libraries list and didn't find one. <heisenberg-25>Btw, is it possible to create parameters that are not thread-local? <civodul>heisenberg-25: not really; these would essentially be global varaibles, though *civodul gives up on ZeroMQ/Fibers integration <civodul>zmq has its own communication thread(s) by default <civodul>it's possible to turn them off, but it looks like you warranty is void when you do that <heisenberg-25>How do you define a custom equality function for rnrs records? <spk121>Ooh. I made guile run in a VteTerminal widget. Fun. <str1ngs>sneek: later tell dadiid, I'll find some thing that uses GList and port it. I think all more use cases right now gobject lists as you mentioned. <str1ngs>sneek: later tell. nly thanks for looking at that generic method issue. That explains why it's not working. I'll define them in a single file see if that resolves it. <str1ngs>sneek: later tell nly. thanks for looking at that generic method issue. That explains why it's not working. I'll define them in a single file see if that resolves it ***sneek_ is now known as sneek
<jcowan>Why would people prefer it to good old Netlib and friends? <ft>Oh, I don't really have a preference. I'm just looking to perform fourier transforms on data I got in a Guile program. And that was something that came up. :) <ft>I realise I should have maybe asked my real question. ;) <ft>Any implementation of said transform that you know of that guile will be happy with? :) <ft>mwette: Thanks! That seems to be the cooley tukey variant. I'll give it a shot. :)