***ijp` is now known as ijp
***didi is now known as didi``
***SHODAN is now known as Guest4053
***_zxq9_ is now known as zxq9
***_zxq9_ is now known as zxq9
***siel_ is now known as siel
<zacts>I'm going to test out guile-2.0.10 on FreeBSD in about an hour or so. <zacts>I just wanted to report problems back to him. <zacts>hopefully before the new release ***adhoc_ is now known as adhoc
<zacts>mark_weaver: let me finish this minix patch, and I'll test the latest guile-2.0.10 for you on FreeBSD. <microcode>mark_weaver: there are non-7.4 versions of gc at this point? <mark_weaver>I've also heard that the latest libgc from its git repo has some fixes that make it work better with guile master. <zacts>hey, hm.. I'm getting really sleepy, so this guile-2.0 on FreeBSD will have to wait until tomorrow. sorry. :-) gn. <antoineB>hello is it possible using the module reflection to access all the defined bindings? <ijp>it's a little more work if you included imports in your definition of defined <ijp>that's a repitition, not a clarification <ijp>(define (defined-names module) (hash-map->list (lambda (k v) k) (module-obarray module))) <ijp>don't be alarmed by the presence of %module-public-interface ***Shozan is now known as SHODAN
<amz3>I'm looking for yield-like "syntax" in scheme <amz3>it seems to me that it's not recommended to implement such a thing in scheme <amz3>or better phrased it will have a performance impact <amz3>since my the point in using "yield" is having syntactic sugar for async code <amz3>what do you think? Is there really a performance impact in writring yield-style code in guile? <amz3>also it seems to me that callback style is more natural to scheme than yield... <amz3>the advice of Mark Witmer (creator of guile-xcb, guile-wm) or the creator of guile2d can be of interest <xchg>hey, I am trying scheme and when I call list-tabulate I get unbound variable error. Is there a module I have to load to make the procedure accesible? <xchg>hmm now it doesn't recognize srfi procedure <xchg>--use-srfi=1 works though <ijp>it's a module name, not a procedure <ijp>(use-modules (srfi srfi-1)) <xchg>I didn't really have a concept of modules in scheme I just guessed the terminology