IRC channel logs
2025-04-25.log
back to list of logs
<daddy>one step closer to bootstrapped coreboot <daddy>... I wonder if C => Go => Ada would count? <daddy>I suppose the only claim is "auditable" trail <daddy>It doesn't, but I'd rather write Go than C. <daddy>Just a little thought experiment, probably not a practical course to pursue <lanodan>Ah yeah Go would make sense, although part of me does wonder a bit how it will work out long term (think decades) as Go now requires multiple steps to bootstrap <daddy>multiple, yes, but they're quite fast and far between (AIUI) <daddy>much unlike Rust, which is so much more difficult <daddy>I think going from stage0 to Go (which can be tinycc'd!) takes about as long as stage3 to rust. <daddy>at least for stagex, where there's likely room for optimizations <lanodan>Yeah Rust would be a disaster, same for like Java, or $deity forbids C# <daddy>god, Java. at least Rust doesn't need X. <lanodan>I think that one's optional but well I haven't managed to bootstrap java here, maybe some kind of musl issues I haven't dug (I just avoid java for now) <matrix_bridge><Andrius Štikonas> musl should be fine, just need some patches to openjdk <fossy>out of curiosity, who's behind the Ada bootstrap?